A condition of agricultural occupation, also known as an agricultural tie, is an instrument used to limit people who have the right to live in rural housing. It generally limits the occupancy of a dwelling to a person who is primarily employed in agriculture in the region or who has been employed as a last resort. If the occupier has not met the condition of agricultural occupancy for a period of 10 years and can prove it to the local authority with satisfactory evidence, the situation may be temporarily deactivated. Agricultural links have been around for 70 years and are still in use today, indicating that they still have a place in the planning system. The general principle is to allow agricultural and forestry workers to live in or near their workplace and most councils suggest that it is always important to maintain a rural housing stock for these workers. The Sutton Springs decision also noted that the decision to eliminate a condition of agricultural occupancy should give considerable importance to the fact that eligible farm workers could not afford the property. This property was even marketed with a significant discount, without success. A transaction contract is a legally binding confidential agreement between the employer and the worker. A transaction contract is usually coupled with compensation.
Kevin Prince, then of the Strutt-Parker office in Salisbury, but now at Adkin, added: “Over the last 10 years, we have found that due to the lack of good properties of more than 100 hectares, there is no agricultural link with this amount of land. Once they have less than 20 to 30 hectares, it becomes a problem. As the name suggests, employment is limited to people employed in agriculture when it comes to real estate with a condition of agricultural occupation repeatedly referred to as “ag tie” or “ag tag”. Since councils are generally reluctant to remove conditions limiting the use of housing to farm workers, landlords will often try to avoid the need for an application by occupying the land for ten years in violation of the condition and by requesting an existing legality of use or development certificate (CLEUD) to supervise the position. In this case, the family lived in a house subject to agricultural occupation. The woman was the farm worker who ran the farm, but it was at a loss. The man worked elsewhere and the family depended on his income. The court found that the husband was dependent on his wife and found that the definition of “dependent” was extended to a husband or wife who was not financially dependent on the other, and the husband was therefore considered dependent on his wife for the purposes of the illness. Some councils regularly write to dwellings in conditions of occupancy to inquire about their compliance; Some boards take a less proactive approach to implementation. Sometimes a neighbour or filing a seemingly inconsistent planning request will draw the Commission`s attention to the breach of the condition. It is almost impossible to know whether the Council is aware of a violation of this condition, but the consequences can be serious if this is the case.
“Can you help me remove the farm tie if I buy the property?” It is possible to modify a condition to, for example, align it with modern formulation or to add other quasi-agricultural uses such as grazing horses. This must also be done through a request to establish the plan with the municipality. A condition of control occupancy that can live or occupy in the apartment and who cannot own it.